综合(GMAT官方指南)(英文)

从2006年1月1日起，GMAT考试的出题和管理机构由ETS（Educational Testing Service，美国教育考试服务中心）和Thomson Prometric转移至ACT、Inc、Pearson VUE。出题机构发生了变化，GMAT考试官方指南第11版由原来的一本分为三本，包括《GMAT官方指南（综合）》、《GMAT官方指南（数学）》和《GMAT官方指南（语文）》。 官方指南（综合）里面所有题目(共800道)全部更新，而且以前的一些出题规律也会有所改变。
为了平稳过渡，第11版官方指南吸收了其他培训机构（如Kaplan和Prentice Review）的长处，以一个由50道Math（数学）和50道Verbal（语文）组成的测试练习（diagnostic section）作为起点，然后才是各个部分的复习策略和练习题。最引人注目的是，第11版中的近800多道题目和第10版的题目没有重复。《GMAT官方指南（数学）》和《GMAT官方指南（语文）》两本复习材料每本包含大约300多道题目，全部来自于第10版的官方指南，因此与新的官方指南的题目没有重合。

1.0
1.1 Why Take the GMAT Test?
1.2 GMAT Test Format
1.3 What is the Conten of the Test Like?
1.4 Quantitative Scetion
1.5 Verbal Section
1.6 What Computer Skills Will I Need?
1.7 What Are the Test Centers Like?
1.8 How Are Scores Calculated?
1.9 Analytical Writing Assessment Scores
1.10 Test Development Process

2.0 How To Prepare
2.1 How Can I Best Prepare to Take the Test?
2.2 What About Practice Tests?
2.3 How Should I Use Diagnostic Test?
2.4 Where Can I Get Additional Practice?
2.5 General Test-Taking Suggestions

3.0 Diagnostic Test
3.1 Quantitative Sample Questions
3.2 Verbal Sample Questions
3.3 Quantitative and Verbal Answer Keys
3.4 Interpretive Guide
3.5 Quantitative Answer Explanations
3.6 Verbal Answer Explanations

4.0 Math Revies
4.1 Arithmetic
4.2 Algebra
4.3 Geometry
4.4 Word Problems

5.0 Problem Solving
……
6.0 Data Sufficiency
7.0 Reading Comprehension
8.0 Critical Reasoning
9.0 Sentence Correction
10.0 Analytical Writing Assessment
Appendix A Percentile Ranking Table
Appendix B Extra Answer Sheets

插图：


Social scientists are underrepresented on the advisory councils of the National Institutes of Health （NIH）. Sincethese councils advise NIH directors and recommend policy, the underrepresentation of social scientists resultsin a relative lack of NIH financial support for research in the social sciences.If the statements above are correct, they most strongly support which of the following？A significant increase in the size of NIH advisory councils would be required in order to increase therepresentation of social scientists on these councils.A significant increase in the representation of social scientists on NIH advisory councils would result in anincrease in NIH funding for social science research.A significant increase in funding for social science research would result in improved policyrecommendations to NIH directors.A significant increase in funding for the training of social scientists would result in an increase in thenumber of social scientists on NIH advisory councils.A significant increase in the representation of social scientists on NIH advisory councils would have toprecede any increase in the number of NIH directors who are social scientists.